- Posted by camryn_admin
- On September 9, 2021
- 0 Comments
Madhya Pradesh`s Supreme Court reinstated a bounce cheque case, which was dismissed by the Court of Justice for non-payment of trial costs. Learn more. www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/fault-of-counsel-in-depositing-the-process-fee/ You can tell him that the contract is terminated for this reason, if he wishes to continue the contract, have him made by transfer on the deposit amount after which you can take into consideration his request. The Supreme Court took into account the delay and suspended the sentence of a woman convicted in the Scheck-Bounce case. Learn more. www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/suspension-of-sentence-in-section-138/ Even if the disgraced cheque was issued pursuant to an agreement to sell real property, it may constitute an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. A court judge for additional meetings in Delhi rejected two appeals by a promoter against his conviction, according to which he was sentenced to 6 months in prison and a fine of Rs 9 Lakh in the bounce check cases. Learn more. www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/section-138-ni-act-builder-to-face-6-month-jail-term-with-rs-9-lakh-as-fine/ Delhi Supreme Court appointed Amicus to determine the controversy over whether the Court of Justice can exonerate an accused in the case from subpoenas under the Negotiable Instruments Act. www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/discharge-in-cheque-bounce-case/ Madras High Court cancelled a bounce cheque case when it found that the cheque was handed over to the bank after it was valid. read more.https:/www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/case-cannot-be-lodged-on-the-basis-of-stale-cheque/The nature of the complaint, As described in the paragraphs above, this is a criminal complaint that could result in a sanction from the defaulting person with respect to the prison sentence, but often does not result in the recipient of the rejected cheque receiving their contributions. Therefore, it would be desirable for the beneficiary to bring a separate civil action to recover the amount due to him. A defendant who has not complied with these conditions cannot be allowed to benefit from this transaction.
The applicant therefore has the right to exercise his appeal within the meaning of the Memorandum of Understanding of 30 June 2016. The aforementioned agreement cannot be considered unenforceable or superseded, especially in view of the omission and breach on the part of the defendant. (Highlighted only here). The Supreme Court upheld an order from the Delhi Supreme Court that the company`s addition as an accused in a bounce check case was accepted by Section 319 CrPC. www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/subsequent-addition-of-company-as-accused/ As the cheque he deposited for the deposit has been returned, the contract is automatically terminated because that was the basis of this agreement, so no case is possible. “While it is well regulated that a sales agreement does not create interest in real estate, it is nevertheless a legally enforceable contract between the parties. A payment made on the basis of such an agreement is therefore a payment made on the basis of a debt or liability applicable in accordance with Article 138`. Kerala`s High Court overturned an acquittal in a bounce check case where the woman claimed her husband had forged his signature on the check, and asked the court to think again. Read more…www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/wife-blames-husband-forging-the-cheque/ The Supreme Court of Calcutta upheld an order by the judge by which he had rejected a request by the accused to drop the proceedings in a bounce check case. .