- Posted by camryn_admin
- On September 22, 2021
- 0 Comments
This group was a liaison body and not a power organ to which each party could send up to 20 support staff. It should meet at least once a year at each of the three sites (Beijing, London and Hong Kong). From 1 July 1988, it had its headquarters in Hong Kong. It should also assist the HKSARs in maintaining and developing economic and cultural relations and conclude agreements on these issues with the States, regions and international organizations concerned, and could therefore establish specialized sub-groups. Between 1985 and 2000, the Joint Liaison Group held 47 plenary sessions, including 18 in Hong Kong, 15 in London and 14 in Beijing. The signing of the joint declaration sparked some controversy in Britain, with British Conservative Party Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher agreeing with the Chinese communist government, represented by Deng Xiaoping.  In the White Paper containing the joint statement, Her Majesty`s Government stated that “the alternative to the adoption of this Agreement is to have no agreement,” a statement intended to refute criticism that the statement has made too many concessions to China and highlights China`s considerable influence during the negotiations.  But before Hong Kong`s return, Britain and China agreed to set up “one country, two systems.” Kenneth Chan, a political scientist at Hong Kong Baptist University, told DW last week, when Britain returned Hong Kong to China, that it was agreed that the city was moving towards democracy. In March 1979, Hong Kong Governor Murray MacLehose made his first official visit to the People`s Republic of China (PRC) and took the initiative to pose deng Xiaoping on the issue of Hong Kong sovereignty.  In the absence of clarification and definition of the official position of the Government of the PRC, the intermediation of real estate leases and credit agreements in Hong Kong would be difficult over the next 18 years.  The Sino-British Joint Declaration itself does not have a mechanism approved by both sides to ensure compliance. Although the Agreement is registered with the United Nations, it did not contain any monitoring mechanism by the United Nations.
Therefore, only the signatories of the declaration have the right to assert possible violations of the conditions. It was precisely at the moment when the atmosphere of the talks became cordial that members of hong Kong`s Legislative Council felt impatient for the long-standing secrecy on the progress of the Sino-British talks on the Hong Kong issue. . . .